Home > Event Management, PSIM, Rachel's Corner > PSIM – Can’t we all just get along?

PSIM – Can’t we all just get along?

Psim_in_dc_event_pictures_015_2Hi again. Rachel here.  For the past few days I’ve been trying to wrap my head around the concept of PSIM – which, as it turns out, is quite the conversation piece. A typical day working for Steve brings several new terms into my vocabulary and, of course, that’s just the beginning. So when he first defined Physical Security Information Management, I tried to understand it the only way I could – directly.

But after sitting in a room with 40 opinionated security professionals, I’ve learned that this trend isn’t always direct. It carries a different meaning and a different set of consequences for each segment of the security market.

The discussion broke PSIM into three major categories: pieces, processes and goals. Pieces, I learned, can be anything one can view from the highest level, for example – credentials, hardware, or people. Processes are then the actions of those pieces – integrating the technology, training the people, and even more fundamental – trusting the people. The goals of combining the right pieces and processes would be to establish a consistent, repeatable solution – something another company could use as a model.

While I realize my understanding remains at a very basic level, I can see a struggle. If some set of standards cannot be agreed on, how will a reliable model ever be made to follow? People must agree on the overall goal of this security challenge. Some say security is the point and others argue that it’s always about the bottom line.

Steve used a pretty simple situation to apply to just about every business decision. He talked about the first ATM machine. It wasn’t installed so that the bank could secure it’s money. It was put in place so they could fire the tellers and make more money. Sure, security was a result, because they had to monitor and control the transactions, but better business was the point.

So does that mean that security is always a result of improving business and not the initial goal? If so, then maybe everyone should agree on that first. Creating standards based on the wrong concept is kind’ve like building a vehicle without knowing the terrain.

  1. June 11, 2008 at 5:10 pm

    Hi Rachel,
    You make an interesting point about the tension between security as improving business versus security as the initial goal.
    One unresolvable tension comes from the difference between private and public sector justification of security.
    In the private sector, serving the business is critical and quantitative financial benefits are routinely needed.
    In the public sector, the goals are more abstract and the financial justifications are less meticulous. It’s common in the public sector for projects to go forward as long as grant money can be found (as such you often seen more questionable projects done by the government). On the other hand, it’s hard to quantify some public risks and a core part of security is planning and managing for very rare but very significant risks (like terrorism).
    I think we will continue to have this divide. PSIM is ideal example of this. I expect PSIM to be adopted rapidly in the government sector but much slower in the private market where stringent demands on immediate payback constrain purchases.

  2. Rachel
    June 17, 2008 at 7:37 am

    I know that we had both the private and the public sector represented at our forum and now that you mention the differences, it explains a lot of the debate. It makes sense that money is more available for certain types of projects and organizations than others. Thanks for clarifying that for me.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: